If you've ever been through a city, you may have seen tiny mini 5G cell towers placed on poles for street lighting. They appear like tiny boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from cell phone providers to your phone.
These smaller towers are replacing the larger built cell towers. Although they're not as visible however, they could create problems for those who live nearby.
It is the of the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds determine the safe limit at which a person can be exposed to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could be harmful to human health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the amount of radiofrequency energy absorbed by tissue. https://paste1s.com/notes/4R76IK4R 's typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
But, since 5g operates at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin and other exposed body parts. This can result in various possible harms, such as an increase in the development of skin conditions such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured over 1 cm2, and not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg averaged over 1 g of tissue at 6 GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure
If you've ever used a mobile phone, you probably know that a safe range from the tower is around 400 meters. This is due to the power of the transmission of a cell tower increases dramatically the further away the tower is.
Although this may sound like something that's good, the reality is that people who live close to towers could be more susceptible to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m of cell towers had significantly more health complaints than those living further far from antennas.
However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from the cell towers saw their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Studies have also revealed that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) can lead to brain tumors, cancers and other health issues.
This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is utilized in wireless communications, can penetrate the human body's outer layer, which is the skin. what is a safe distance from a cell tower is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a shield against injury to the body, infection caused by pathogenic microorganisms and infiltration of toxic substances. Additionally, it is the largest organ in the human body and is accountable for maintaining the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds rely on various assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. This includes the false assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation is safe due to minimal penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
The assumption also ignores the deeper penetration of the ELF elements of modulated radio signals as well as the effects of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower are not compatible with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation. Therefore they shouldn't be considered for health protection exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC restrict its maximum levels of radiation exposure for local peak SARs, based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to assess the amount of radiation exposure. In particular, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation and other environmental agents may cause synergistic or antagonistic effects. This would result in an increased risk of negative health adverse effects. For instance, exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may cause an increase in the incidence of developing skin cancer and exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.