Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

· 3 min read
Very best safest distance from your 5G cell Structure?

If you've ever been through a town, you may have seen tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however, they're actually transmitting wireless signals from mobile providers to your mobile.

They are replacing the larger, purpose-built cell towers. While they're not as noticeable however, they could cause problems for people.
It is the FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds

The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe distance that one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits for exposure are based on scientific data which prove that electromagnetic energy could cause harm to health.

The absorption rate specific (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy absorption by tissues. It's typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one kilogram of tissue.

However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other exposed body areas. This could lead to various potential problems, including an increased development of skin diseases such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.

Because of the potentially harmful effects of radiation from 5G, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized limits on power density, which is 4mW/cm2 based on the average on 1cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for all 5G services running at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is in accordance with the highest SAR spatial-average of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds for Maximum Exposure


If you've ever used a mobile phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower should be at least 400 meters away. This is due to the power of transmission from a cell tower increases dramatically the further away your location from the tower.

While it sounds like a good idea however, people who live close to towers may actually be more prone to health problems. For instance, a 2014 study in India found that residents who lived within 50m from cell towers suffered much more health problems than those living further away from the antennas.

However, this study also found that people who moved to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms return to normal within a few days.  https://controlc.com/956dcecb  have also shown that exposure to high amounts of electromagnetic field radiofrequency (EMFs) could cause cancer, brain tumors, and other health problems.

This is due to the fact that RF radiation, which is used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, called the skin. It is crucial to know because the skin serves as a barrier to protect against injury to the body, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and entry of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
safe distance from cell tower  are based upon many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific evidence. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal radiation penetration in the human body (i.e. thermal heating of tissue).

This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of brief bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed.  safe distance to live from cell phone tower  are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be relied upon for health-protection exposure guidelines.

Additionally there is the fact that both ICNIRP and FCC restrict their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs based on the maximum spatial specific absorption rate (psSAR) which is not a reliable dosimetric instrument to determine the degree of radiation exposure. Particularly the psSAR tool is not accurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. Furthermore, psSAR has not been evaluated for RF radiation that is exposed to other environmental agents such like sunlight. The interactions of RF radiations with different environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer and exacerbate other skin diseases such as acne.