If you've ever wandered through a town and spotted tiny cell towers for 5G on the poles of street lights. safe distance from cell tower look like little boxes, but they're actually broadcasting wireless signals from cell phone providers to your mobile.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. While they're not as noticeable, they still can cause problems for people.
A FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds establish the safe limit at which one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The exposure limits are based upon scientific research that show that RF energy can cause harm to health.
The rate of absorption called the specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indication of the radiofrequency energy taken up by tissues. what is a safe distance from a 5g cell tower is typically 1.6 Watts per kilogram averaged over one Gram of tissue.
However, because 5g transmits at higher frequencies this could be able to create more energy on the skin as well as other body parts. This could lead to various possible harms, such as an increase in appearance of skin disorders like dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to set a general localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 measured across 1 centimeter, but not exceeding 30 minutes for all 5G services at 3000 GHz. This localized limit is consistent with the maximum spatial-average SAR of 1.6 W/kg, averaged over one grams of tissues at six GHz.
The FCC's Maximum Exposure Thresholds
In the event that you've used cell phone, then you've probably realized that the safest distance from the tower is around 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from the cell tower is significantly increased the further away you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health problems. For instance, a study conducted in 2014 in India found that residents living within 50 meters of cell towers had much more health problems than those who were distance from them.
But, the study revealed that those who relocated into areas farther away from cell towers experienced their symptoms return to normal within a couple of days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) can cause brain tumors, cancers as well as other health issues.
This is because the RF radiation used in wireless communication, can penetrate the human body's exterior layer, which is the skin. This is important to understand because the skin serves as a shield against mechanical injury, infection by pathogenic microorganisms, and the entry of harmful substances. Additionally, it is the biggest organ of the human body. It is responsible for keeping the integrity of other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposition Thresholds are based upon numerous assumptions that are not supported by scientific research. safe distance from cell tower includes the false belief that short-term exposures RF radiation are safe due to the limited penetration into the body (i.e., tissue heating).
This assumption does not take into account the greater penetration of ELF parts of the modulated RF signal as well as the effect of short bursts of heat generated by RF waves that are pulsed. These assumptions are not in line with the current understanding of biological effects of RF radiation, and thus, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC are limiting their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs that are based on the peak speed of spatial absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of exposure to radiofrequency radiation. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate for frequencies that exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been evaluated for RF radiation exposed to other agents of the environment such as sunlight. In the event of interactions, RF radiation with other environmental agents could result in antagonistic or synergistic results. This would result in an increased risk of adverse health effects. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation with sunlight may raise the chance of skin cancer, as well as aggravate other skin disorders, such as acne.