If you've ever wandered through a city and spotted tiny mini 5G cell towers on the poles of street lights. They look like small boxes however they're actually sending wireless signals from mobile providers to your phone.
The smaller ones are being replaced by the larger specially-designed cell towers. Although they're not as visible but they can still cause problems for people.
It is the Federal Communications Commission's Radiation Exposure Thresholds
The FCC's Radiation Exposure Thresholds define the maximum amount of time one can expose to electromagnetic radiation from wireless devices. The limits of exposure are based upon scientific research which show that the energy of RF could be harmful to human health.
The specific absorption rate (SAR) is an indicator of the radiofrequency energy that is absorption by tissues. safe distance to live from cell phone tower is typically 1.6 watts per kilogram, averaged over one Gram of tissue.
Since 5g is able to transmit at higher frequencies, it has the potential to increase the intensity of energy on the skin and other directly-exposed body parts. This could lead to various potential harms, including exacerbated appearance of skin disorders such as dermatitis, skin cancer and cataracts.
Due to the potential for negative effects of 5G radiation, PSU has chosen to establish a general, localized power density limit of 4 mW/cm2 averaged over 1 cm2, but not to exceed 30 minutes for the entire 5G spectrum at 3000 GHz. This limit for localization is in line with the highest SAR that is spatially averaged at 1.6 W/kg, which is averaged over 1 5 grams of body tissue, at 6 GHz.
safe distance to live from cell phone tower
If you've ever used a cell phone, you're probably aware that the safest range from the tower is at least 400 meters away. This is because the power of transmission from cell towers increases drastically the further you are from it.
While it sounds like something that's good but the truth is that people who live close to towers could be more prone to health issues. For example, a study from 2014 in India found that those living within 50 meters of cell towers experienced significant more health issues than those living further distance from them.
This study revealed that those who relocated to areas further away from cell towers noticed their symptoms improve within a few days. Other studies have shown that exposure to high levels of radiofrequency electromagnetic fields (EMFs) could cause brain tumors, cancer as well as other health issues.
This is due to the fact that the RF radiation used in wireless communication can be absorbed by the body's outer layer, called the skin. This is vital to be aware of since the skin functions as a protective barrier against injuries caused by mechanical forces, infections by pathogenic microorganisms, and infiltration of toxic substances. The skin is the most important organ of the human body, and is accountable for protecting other organs.
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds for the Minimum Exposure
The FCC's Minimum Exposure Thresholds are based on many assumptions that aren't supported by scientific research. These include the erroneous assumption that short-term exposures to RF radiation are safe because of the minimal absorption into body (i.e., tissue heating).
This also overlooks the more extensive penetration of ELF elements of modulated radio signals, as well as the effects of short bursts of heat from pulsed RF waves. https://pastebin.pl/view/e3582c98 are not in line with current understanding of the biological consequences of RF radiation. Therefore, they should not be used for health protective exposure standards.
In addition, the ICNIRP and FCC limit their maximum exposure limits to local peak SARs, based on the peak frequency of absorption (psSAR) which is an inadequate dosimetric tool to assess the amount of radiation exposure. Particularly, psSAR is inaccurate when frequencies exceed 6 GHz. In addition, psSAR is not been tested for RF radiation with co-exposure to other environmental agents such like sunlight. Interactions of RF radiation and other environmental agents may produce synergistic or antagonistic results. This would result in the risk of having adverse health consequences. For example, co-exposure to RF radiation and sunlight could raise the chance of developing skin cancer, and may also exacerbate other skin conditions like acne.